LegalFacts
Home
Practice Areas
AttorneysAbout UsPricing
ContactGrow Your PracticeSign In
The LegalFacts Scorecard

Attorney Ratings Built on Facts, Not Opinions

A transparent, data-driven rating system that helps you find attorneys you can trust. Every score is backed by verifiable evidence\u2014not paid placements or anonymous reviews.

Verified Data • Transparent Methodology • No Pay-to-Play

10+

Data Sources

100%

Rule-Based

0

Paid Placements

50+

Data Points

Our Approach

What Makes Our Scores Different

Every LegalFacts score is built on verifiable evidence—not paid placements, anonymous reviews, or opaque algorithms.

Official Records First

State bar records provide the authoritative source for license status, admission dates, and disciplinary history—the foundation of every score.

Third-Party Verification

Client reviews from independent platforms and peer recognition from established legal organizations contribute objective, unbiased signals.

Deterministic Scoring

Transparent, reproducible calculations with no black-box algorithms. Every score can be traced directly to the underlying data that produced it.

Corroboration Required

Multiple sources are cross-referenced and discrepancies are flagged. A claim that cannot be corroborated does not improve a score.

The Methodology

How We Calculate Scores

Scores are built from ten weighted pillars, each tied to independently verifiable data sources. No pillar is opaque and no weight is hidden.

Ethical StandingOfficial Records • 20%

License status and disciplinary history with the state bar.

Credentials & ExperienceOfficial + Verification • 20%

Years admitted, education, advanced degrees, and practice areas.

Client SatisfactionIndependent Platforms • 15%

Public reviews across Avvo, Google, and Yelp — weighted by volume.

Verified CredentialsAttorney Documentation • 10%

Documents in the Disclosure Pack verified by the LegalFacts team.

Peer RecognitionLegal Organizations • 10%

SuperLawyers, Best Lawyers, Rising Star, and Avvo endorsements.

Track Record & OutcomesPublished Results • 10%

Case volume, sustained practice, and documented outcomes.

Specialization DepthAttorney Documentation • 5%

Board certification and focused practice area distribution.

Cost TransparencyAttorney Documentation • 5%

Disclosed fee structure and availability of a fee agreement template.

ResponsivenessReview NLP + Q&A • 5%

Response sentiment from reviews plus Q&A activity on Avvo.

Professional EngagementPublications, Speaking, Q&A • 5%

Publications, speaking, bar committees, and Q&A contributions.

Official Government / Regulatory
Third-Party Verified
Attorney Verified
Score Tiers

What Each Score Range Means

Scores are expressed as a percentage from 0 to 100. Without attorney verification, scores typically cap at 90—verification unlocks the final 10 points.

95 - 100Elite Verified

Top of the profession with verified Disclosure Pack documents.

90 - 94Elite

Exceptional credentials, recognition, and outcomes.

80 - 89Excellent

Strong across most pillars.

70 - 79Very Good

Solid record with room to verify a few signals.

60 - 69Good

Established practice; data gaps to address.

Below 60Review Carefully

Significant gaps or concerns — review before engaging.

Without verified Disclosure Pack documents, scores are capped at 92. Verifying credentials—bar certificate, board certification, malpractice insurance, fee agreement template, and case declarations—lifts the ceiling and unlocks the Elite Verified tier.

Verification

The Verification Advantage

Anyone can claim impressive results. Verified attorneys prove them. Our Documentation Disclosure Pack allows attorneys to substantiate their credentials with official documentation.

  • Current bar standing confirmed with official documentation

  • Case outcomes attested under penalty of perjury

  • Board certifications validated with certificates

  • Malpractice insurance confirmed active

  • Fee structures disclosed for transparency

Sarah Mitchell


Overall

LegalFacts Score

92%


Experience

15 years


Cases Won

129/140


Specializations

Personal Injury

51/52

Auto Accidents

36/40

Medical Malpractice

23/25

Workplace Injury

19/23


Education

Juris Doctor (JD)

Stanford

Master of Laws (LLM)

Georgetown


Client Ratings

Communication

Excellent

Negotiation

Excellent

Ethics

Excellent

Transparency

Excellent

Availability

Very Good


Pro Bono

120 hrs/yr


Bar Standing

Excellent


“Exceptional communicator, always kept me informed.” — Client, Mark J.

“Results-driven and strategic negotiator.” — Client, Anne T.

Why It Matters

The Problem With Other Rating Sites

Most attorney rating platforms were not designed with the client's interest as the priority. LegalFacts was.

Most rating sites

  • Accept payment for premium placement
  • Rely on unverified, self-reported data
  • Use opaque algorithms that cannot be audited
  • Reward marketing spend over actual performance

Our commitment

  • No paid placements—ever
  • Every score traceable to specific, verifiable data
  • Transparent weights and reproducible calculations
  • Performance and ethics determine rank, not advertising budgets
Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions About Our Scores

Stay Informed On LegalFacts

Join our newsletter for the latest legal tips and updates from our experts.

By continuing you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

LegalFacts

AI-powered attorney matching to find the perfect legal representation for your case.

Platform

  • How It Works
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Claim Profile

Company

  • About Us
  • Top Lawyers
  • AI Assistant
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 LegalFacts. All rights reserved.